Mouvement Européen-France

Mouvement Européen-France


Accueil du site > Vie de l’association > Le MEF dans les médias > French commitments to EU called into question

Le MEF dans les médias

French commitments to EU called into question

Article paru dans le Financial Times, du 13 décembre 2007

par Sylvie Goulard, publié le jeudi 13 décembre 2007

Sir, Nicolas Sarkozy’s role, alongside Angela Merkel, in accelerating the negotiations of the Lisbon treaty, as well as the dynamism of Jean-Pierre Jouyet, France’s secretary of state for European affairs, are signs of a new departure.


However, Henri Guaino’s remarks (“French seek pragmatic EU” and “Paris favours free will over Brussels dogma”, December 10 [voir ci-dessous]) are worrying and in seeming contradiction with the efforts made thus far. While there is always room for improvement by the European Union, there are many in France who do not see the rationale for a shift in European politics or a re-nationalisation of the EU institutions that have served us well.

First and foremost, without respect for the rule of law there would be no EU. By deploring these “general, impersonal, automatic rules which have been fixed in advance”, by calling for institutions that “should become more pragmatic and flexible to reflect changing circumstances and shifts in public opinion”, Mr Guaino effectively pleads for the unravelling of the EU. How could a more heterogeneous Union of 27 states function without clear rules ? Which public opinion, national or European, would inspire these “more flexible” rules ? And at what cost for the single market and the common policies ? Ironically, the common agricultural policy would be the first victim of Mr Guaino’s proposal.

Second, the EU is not running on autopilot. Each treaty was approved by national parliaments or by referendum. The French people voted on the Maastricht treaty creating the euro and enshrining the independence of the European Central Bank. Regulations and directives are adopted by national ministers and by directly elected MEPs. Mr Guaino contests the delegation of competences to independent authorities. It is worth remembering that two great democracies, the UK and the US, have both chosen to have independent central banks.

Furthermore, it is not feasible to expect “national politicians to exercise more influence” over state aids and mergers. European competition authorities are respected worldwide and are far from being considered naive by the likes of Bill Gates and Jack Welch. Only independent authorities can act in the interest of the welfare of the EU as a whole.

Finally, the remarks by Mr Guaino call into question certain fundamental commitments, for example reduction of the public debt. Reducing public debt is not obeying a diktat decreed in Brussels ; it is honouring a promise made by France which is in its best interest.

France will be able to claim – rightly – it is “back in Europe” and exert influence when it sends credible and reliable messages on its legal and economic commitments to the EU.


French seek pragmatic EU By Ben Hall and John Thornhill in Paris, paru le 9 décembre 2007

Nicolas Sarkozy’s determination that the European Union should not be a “machine that just advances on its own” and must allow elected national politicians to exercise more influence over competition, monetary and trade policies, has been underlined by the French president’s chief political strategist. In an interview with the Financial Times, Henri Guaino said EU institutions should become more pragmatic and flexible to reflect changing circumstances and shifts in public opinion. “European affairs cannot be governed only by general, impersonal, automatic rules which have been fixed in advance. Europe should debate these things together and decide together, as happens in all other democracies in the world.” Mr Guaino said it was “perfectly absurd” that the EU competition authorities were more doctrinaire than their US counterparts, putting Europe “in a very naive position of inferiority, of vulnerability”. He suggested the eurozone’s political leaders should have more say over the European Central Bank’s monetary policy and hinted that France could eventually press for changes to the ECB’s rules to force it to do so. “For the moment there is no project to change the statutes of the ECB but France wants to strengthen economic governance and to discuss this monetary policy because in a democracy we should be able to discuss everything,” he said. Mr Guaino’s comments on EU policies are likely to sound alarm bells in Brussels, where the rule of law and delegated decision-making are regarded as the building blocks of European market integration. Mr Guaino singled out the European Commission’s competition policy as an example of official dogma. “The theory of competition is not sacred. It evolves ; it changes,” he said. “In the US, antitrust policy is to pursue and condemn those who abuse their dominant market position. In Europe we say you are big and therefore in a dominant position . . . with a tendency to abuse it. From the point of view of all the principles of law this is perfectly absurd. “Yes, competition is better than a monopoly. But if you have a religious, dogmatic vision you are going to end up putting the European economy in a situation of extreme inferiority compared with all other countries.” Mr Guaino gave notice to other eurozone governments that France would not slash spending or raise taxes to put its public finances in order, but would wait for reforms to produce higher economic growth. “In the short term you are not going to see public spending fall very easily. The most important thing to sort out public finances for the longer term, is to replace bad public spending with useful public spending. And if it works, it is going to improve productivity, and spending will fall as a share of gross domestic product.” On the domestic front, Mr Guaino defended Mr Sarkozy’s gradual and consensual approach to labour market reform. The government was in for the long haul, he said. It would not blunder into a confrontation with unions, workers and students as its predecessors did in 1995 and 2006. Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2007

Paris seeks release from Brussels dogma By Ben Hall and John Thornill in Paris, paru le 10 décembre 2007

The European Union cannot be a « machine that just advances on its own » and must allow elected national politicians to exercise more influence over competition, monetary and trade policies, according to Nicolas Sarkozy’s chief political strategist. In an interview with the Financial Times, Henri Guaino said that EU institutions should become more pragmatic and flexible to reflect changing circumstances and shifts in public opinion. « European affairs cannot be governed only by general, impersonal, automatic rules which have been fixed in advance. Europe should debate these things together and decide together, as happens in all other democracies in the world, » he said. Mr Guaino said it was « perfectly absurd » that the EU competition authorities were more doctrinaire than their US counterparts, putting Europe « in a very naive position of inferiority, of vulnerability ». He suggested that the eurozone’s political leaders should have more say over the European Central Bank’s monetary policy and hinted that France could eventually press for changes to the ECB’s rules to force it to do so. « For the moment there is no project to change the statutes of the ECB but France wants to strengthen economic governance and to discuss this monetary policy because in a democracy we should be able to discuss everything, » he said. Mr Guaino, who is Mr Sarkozy’s main speechwriter, has emerged as one of the most influential -figures in the French president’s administration. As an old-style, eurosceptical Gaullist with an attachment to social -justice, Mr Guaino is widely regarded as the inspiration for the more nationalist, -protectionist and interventionist propositions that blur Mr Sarkozy’s image as a free-market liberal. The two men also share a deep -disdain for technocratic -government. Mr Guaino’s comments on EU policies are likely to set alarm bells ringing in Brussels, where the rule of law and delegated decision-making are regarded as the building blocks of European integration. Mr Guaino singled out the European Commission’s competition policy as an example of official dogma. « The theory of competition is not sacred. It evolves, it changes, » he said. « In the US, antitrust policy is to pursue and condemn those who abuse their dominant market position. In Europe we investigate the presumption of abuse of dominant market position. We say you are big and therefore in a dominant position. You will therefore have a tendency to abuse it. From the point of view of all the principles of law this is perfectly absurd. »Yes, openness is better than restrictiveness. Yes, competition is better than a monopoly. But if you have a religious, dogmatic vision you are going to end up putting the European -economy in a situation of extreme inferiority -com- pared with all other countries.« Similarly, the ECB »could not escape its political environment. The bank cannot live its life outside the European political debate, outside public opinion." Mr Sarkozy has strongly criticised the ECB’s hawkish monetary policy, comparing it unfavourably with the activism of the US Federal Reserve. Mr Guaino gave notice to other eurozone governments that France would not slash spending or raise taxes to put its public finances in order, but would wait for reforms to produce higher economic growth. « In the short term you are not going to see public spending fall very easily. The most important thing to sort out the public finances for the longer term is to replace bad public spending with useful public spending. And if it works, it is going to improve productivity, and spending will fall as a share of gross domestic -product. » On the domestic front, Mr Guaino defended Mr Sarkozy’s gradual and consensual approach to reform of labour markets. The government was in for the long haul, he said. It would not blunder into a confrontation with unions, workers and students as its predecessors did in 1995 and 2006. Mr Sarkozy was determined to carry people with him on his reform programme. Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2007

Auteurs

Sylvie Goulard
Présidente du Mouvement Européen France, enseignante au Collège d’Europe à Bruges, chercheur associé au CERI.

Écrire à Sylvie Goulard



Le Mouvement Européen
Vie de l’association
Sections locales et associations
Informations sur l’Europe
Mouvement Européen France - 95 rue de Rennes - 75006 Paris - Tél. : +33 (0)1 45 49 93 93 - Fax : +33 (0)1 45 49 96 65

Contacts | Mentions légales et crédits